For people who don't understand what I mean, I will explain.
Ten years ago, Lesnar left the WWE which was big at the time as he had been booked heavily beating The Rock, The Undertaker, Kurt Angle, Big Show etc in his first year with the company, they basically pushed him to the moon.
Now my theory is, since Brock left all those years ago, the WWE has been very cautious with booking talent too quickly incase something similar happens. There is no way to look to the future, and if Roman Reigns beat The Undertaker (a popular choice I've seen to have end the streak) he could have possibly have done a Lesnar and left the company.
So my question is, did Lesnar leaving cause this with no up and comers beating The Undertaker? I mean they had plenty of chances to end it, Orton could have ended it in 2005, Batista a lot of people thought would end it in 2007 etc. What do you think?
Ten years ago, Lesnar left the WWE which was big at the time as he had been booked heavily beating The Rock, The Undertaker, Kurt Angle, Big Show etc in his first year with the company, they basically pushed him to the moon.
Now my theory is, since Brock left all those years ago, the WWE has been very cautious with booking talent too quickly incase something similar happens. There is no way to look to the future, and if Roman Reigns beat The Undertaker (a popular choice I've seen to have end the streak) he could have possibly have done a Lesnar and left the company.
So my question is, did Lesnar leaving cause this with no up and comers beating The Undertaker? I mean they had plenty of chances to end it, Orton could have ended it in 2005, Batista a lot of people thought would end it in 2007 etc. What do you think?
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire