Does it really matter if you've only stayed in the one company?

One argument that many people have used when debating John Cena vs Ric Flair title reign argument is that even if Cena was to surpass Flair, Flair's is still a better achievement as he did it in multiple companies and Cena has only competed in the WWE.



Does that really matter though?



In my opinion, (however little it means) all of John Cena's titles have come in the biggest mainstream wrestling company in the world. These days there is a clear number one and then there is TNA (not bashing here) who are a long way away from being considered competition. In the modern day wrestling world you cant really expect WWE's top stars to jump around companies like they once did as there isnt another large company that can pay them more, which is why it is now irrelevant how many different companies you have been champion in. You cant count winning in the likes of ROH, TNA and so on these days as they just arent big enough to be really considered world championships. One day hopefully they are, but for now they are not.



So what does everyone else think? Does it really matter these days if someone is only champion in one company?