Sure, it's not the 1970s, and you see these guys all the time. But is it really necessary for Cena to have 15 titles? Triple H and Orton to have 13? Edge to have 11?
Pay-per-views went monthly in 1995, and Raw had been weekly since 1993. Shawn Michaels and The Undertaker lived through that era into the 2010s and have four and seven world titles respectively; they are both widely argued as the single greatest professional wrestler in history.
I don't get why the title has to be thrown around like it is. I remember in 1997 when Bret Hart had an incredible five world titles. Now Cena has fifteen. It's just horrible and makes the title look like tacky sh!t.
Pay-per-views went monthly in 1995, and Raw had been weekly since 1993. Shawn Michaels and The Undertaker lived through that era into the 2010s and have four and seven world titles respectively; they are both widely argued as the single greatest professional wrestler in history.
I don't get why the title has to be thrown around like it is. I remember in 1997 when Bret Hart had an incredible five world titles. Now Cena has fifteen. It's just horrible and makes the title look like tacky sh!t.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire