samedi 29 mars 2014

WWE made a mistake getting rid of the two titles.

People have accused WWE of making a lot of mistakes over the last few months.



Well, in hindsight, the biggest one, for me, was to unify the WWE and World Title.



If they hadn't done that, WWE could have had Batista win the Rumble, and fight Orton, one-on-one, for one title, and Daniel Bryan fighting the champion of the other title. Bryan gets his title shot, and WWE get Orton-Batista.



They could have had Bryan main-event and fighting the WWE Champion, whereas Batista v Orton could have been third-last on the card, (with a lesser match bracketing it).



I also think that Batista wouldn't have been booed and turned heel, because fans would have reasoned that, just because Batista won the Rumble, it doesn't stop Bryan winning a title in the main event at Wrestlemania.



Hell, have Bryan fight Cena again (who was champion before the Unification) in a rematch of their Summerslam epic, and have Bryan win again, or put Bryan against someone in the Authority who is champion (other than Orton, who is defending the other belt).



So, do you think two titles would have helped the current situation, and made things more pleasant for everyone (since both the fans and WWE get the matches they want).




Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire