Am I wrong for thinking this way?

I had this simplitic thought earlier today about TNA Impact



In thinking about successfull award winning movies and TV shows of the past I realized something at its highest level.



Good movie/TV show =

Steamlines the story and its cohesive from start to finish regardless what catagory the movie is (Action, Comedy, etc) and normally the actors are playing the right roles.



Bad movie/TV show =

Too much going on, no real point to be made, no explaination.



OR the audience goes into a movie needing to have some kind of back ground to enjoy it.

****(Example ever been with your husband or wife to watch a sequal to a movie you had no interest in or saw the original movie to make sense of what was going on? and didn't enjoy it?)



Or they have the wrong actors in the wrong roles

****(Example: Would you want to see Arnold or Stallone in a chick flick? or would they be better suited in an action film?)



Well the latter "bad movie" has been TNA Impact lately IMO, they need to find a way to change it back to the "good movie" option. I realize its just an analogy I made up, but I hope you get the point.



I love TNA (Most of you all know that) but the last month or two have been dreadful, the show and audience appear bored on TV :( Impact is still a TV show but lacks the excitement feel that other sports shows or movie's show to give the people watching a reason to join in on the excitement.



************************************************** ************************************************** *********

Does my analogy fit the times right now? or am I wrong for thinking this way?



NOTE: This isn't a thread regarding "How to fix TNA" but how do you feel about the product recently? How do you like how its being potrayed on TV?