So recently the MPAA banned the Sin City poster with Eva Green on it
Personally I don't see what the big deal is about. Yes her breasts are partly exposed and you can (barely) make out a bit of nipple but she's not doing a sexual pose or anything.
I find this strange because you can easily find a public poster of Miley Cyrus licking a mirror/grinding on something. Or Katy Perry naked with convenient things covering parts of her body and various other pop stars doing similar things
My question is why does the entertainment industry have a lopsided, flip flop way of looking at images (especially of women) that may be deemed arousing/sexual. It seems perfectly acceptable to have a pop star (who's main audience are teenagers) partly nude, doing a sexual pose on a big board. But when a poster has a women wearing a gown with a bit of exposed breast showing for a film that is for adults that's to much??
Click for Spoiler:
Personally I don't see what the big deal is about. Yes her breasts are partly exposed and you can (barely) make out a bit of nipple but she's not doing a sexual pose or anything.
I find this strange because you can easily find a public poster of Miley Cyrus licking a mirror/grinding on something. Or Katy Perry naked with convenient things covering parts of her body and various other pop stars doing similar things
My question is why does the entertainment industry have a lopsided, flip flop way of looking at images (especially of women) that may be deemed arousing/sexual. It seems perfectly acceptable to have a pop star (who's main audience are teenagers) partly nude, doing a sexual pose on a big board. But when a poster has a women wearing a gown with a bit of exposed breast showing for a film that is for adults that's to much??
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire