ok so first a few facts and questions then ill make my point.
1st off according to wikipedia "Flair is officially recognized by WWE, TNA, and Pro Wrestling Illustrated as a 20-time world heavyweight champion (ten-time NWA Champion, eight-time WCW Champion, and two-time WWF Champion) although the actual number of his world championship reigns varies by source"
however wwe always mentions him as a 16 time world champ on tv. so which one is it?
2nd: "Cena is a 15-time World champion, consisting of a record 12 reigns as WWE Champion/WWE World Heavyweight Champion and three reigns as World Heavyweight Champion."
3rd: "Randy Orton is an eight-time WWE Champion/WWE World Heavyweight Champion and a four-time World Heavyweight Champion, making him a 12-time world champion."
however again i recall wwe mentioning on tv that he is a 13 time world champ. so which is it?
now my main question is this: do john cena and randy orton deserve to beat flairs record? they each probably have a good 5 years or more left. cena will deffinately beat the record and orton very well could. but does it mean as much if they do? flair won world titles in 3 different decades,1980's to 2001. cena has won all his over a 9 year span, 2005 to 2014. and orton over a 10 year span, 2004 to 2014.
i am curious about everyones thoughts on this. is flair's record that impressive or is it overrated? do cena or orton deserve to beat the record? and if they do beat it will it really mean that much considering the different eras and shorter time they would do it in?
1st off according to wikipedia "Flair is officially recognized by WWE, TNA, and Pro Wrestling Illustrated as a 20-time world heavyweight champion (ten-time NWA Champion, eight-time WCW Champion, and two-time WWF Champion) although the actual number of his world championship reigns varies by source"
however wwe always mentions him as a 16 time world champ on tv. so which one is it?
2nd: "Cena is a 15-time World champion, consisting of a record 12 reigns as WWE Champion/WWE World Heavyweight Champion and three reigns as World Heavyweight Champion."
3rd: "Randy Orton is an eight-time WWE Champion/WWE World Heavyweight Champion and a four-time World Heavyweight Champion, making him a 12-time world champion."
however again i recall wwe mentioning on tv that he is a 13 time world champ. so which is it?
now my main question is this: do john cena and randy orton deserve to beat flairs record? they each probably have a good 5 years or more left. cena will deffinately beat the record and orton very well could. but does it mean as much if they do? flair won world titles in 3 different decades,1980's to 2001. cena has won all his over a 9 year span, 2005 to 2014. and orton over a 10 year span, 2004 to 2014.
i am curious about everyones thoughts on this. is flair's record that impressive or is it overrated? do cena or orton deserve to beat the record? and if they do beat it will it really mean that much considering the different eras and shorter time they would do it in?
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire