When WWF bought WCW there was money to be made. The WCW brand still could have lived yet Vince wanted to bury them completely. With this on-going battle of TNA and their tv contact, it's a possibility that TNA might be facing some hard times. So lets look at the Hypothetical yet Plausible situation:
WWE buys TNA
Instead of nitpicking guys from TNA and putting them on an already packed WWE roster, why not keep TNA running as is. Let TNA compete with WWE. Paul Heyman and Jim Ross could be sent to TNA and are told to run the company the way they want it. Build the audience, do the booking, bring the ratings. Compete from within. Whatever profits TNA makes goes to WWE anyways. Don't do some crossover show. Let the corporate office compete with each other.
It makes me think of the company Procter and Gamble. Example: they own Zest and Old Spice. Both are body washes. Two different products that compete against each other yet still owned by one company.
If WWE wants to monopolize the wrestling market (which that have that strangle hold) why not try doing this with TNA so that way it keeps mainstream wrestling alive.
Anyone understand what I'm getting at? Let the products stand alone yet compete under the same corporation. Let them be different products.
TNA also could be its own company yet still have pay per views shown on the WWE Network. The wrestling fan will almost be getting a PPV every two weeks to watch on Sunday. Again, No crossovers, let the companies run as if they don't acknowledge each other.
Any Thoughts on this?
WWE buys TNA
Instead of nitpicking guys from TNA and putting them on an already packed WWE roster, why not keep TNA running as is. Let TNA compete with WWE. Paul Heyman and Jim Ross could be sent to TNA and are told to run the company the way they want it. Build the audience, do the booking, bring the ratings. Compete from within. Whatever profits TNA makes goes to WWE anyways. Don't do some crossover show. Let the corporate office compete with each other.
It makes me think of the company Procter and Gamble. Example: they own Zest and Old Spice. Both are body washes. Two different products that compete against each other yet still owned by one company.
If WWE wants to monopolize the wrestling market (which that have that strangle hold) why not try doing this with TNA so that way it keeps mainstream wrestling alive.
Anyone understand what I'm getting at? Let the products stand alone yet compete under the same corporation. Let them be different products.
TNA also could be its own company yet still have pay per views shown on the WWE Network. The wrestling fan will almost be getting a PPV every two weeks to watch on Sunday. Again, No crossovers, let the companies run as if they don't acknowledge each other.
Any Thoughts on this?
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire