It was reported here earlier today that the WWE officials don't know what to do with Lesnar and the WWEWHC for the next PPV, Hell In A Cell. Putting aside how tedious and stupid this is, the obvious solution is have Cena vs Lesnar inside the cell. Give the feud a closure with Lesnar going over, hoping that we see some difference in Cena's personality and Lesnar keeping the title etc.
Now, if they don't wanna do Lesnar vs Cena again, they can add someone else in the mix. To me, even if I generally am against Cena being constantly in the main event, I believe that he has to be in it now just for the closure. You can add Orton or Ambrose or even Bray Wyatt to mix it up completely. Lesnar would still go over.
On the other hand, if they can't get Lesnar to work HIAC, they can always have a #1 contender's match as the main event for the show. Someone has to be proven good enough to be a viable threat to Lesnar, which is the exact reason for that match to take place. Since Dean and Seth have their feud, you can have those two fight over the #1 contender's spot, even though it isn't needed nor does it make sense, since Seth is already mr. MITB. The obvious solution is a Cena vs Orton vs maybe Kane, and hell, you can even add Dean and Seth in the mix to stall their feud for TLC.
The WWEWHC missing from a PPV is a rare occasion, but it happened back in 2012 with Cm Punk, and the PPV wasn't so bad (we got that 6 man tornado tag and that Ziggler vs Cena ladder match). I suppose that having a decent #1 conteder's match and Dean vs Seth in the cell should sell the show. Of course, if Brock works HIAC, as stated above, it is either Brock vs Cena or you can add Orton to the mix. Orton (and Kane) is showing his displeasure towards Rollins lately, and also had a fight with HHH recently which means he might get away from the Authority, thus chaning the dynamic of the main event scene.
It's not rocket science, creative... Heyman could have come out and say that "someone needs to prove they are good enough, they have what it takes to face Brock and may be able to come out on top." This way, he doesn't specify if the challenger will face Brock at HIAC or in a later PPV, or when that challenger will be revealed, but it definitely buys the WWE some time and gives the fans some explanation / update to what is gonna happen. Not having Paul come out at all just because they don't know how to go on is completely stupid to me, but them not knowing what to do is even more stupid... No wonder why their ratings plummeted this week.
Now, if they don't wanna do Lesnar vs Cena again, they can add someone else in the mix. To me, even if I generally am against Cena being constantly in the main event, I believe that he has to be in it now just for the closure. You can add Orton or Ambrose or even Bray Wyatt to mix it up completely. Lesnar would still go over.
On the other hand, if they can't get Lesnar to work HIAC, they can always have a #1 contender's match as the main event for the show. Someone has to be proven good enough to be a viable threat to Lesnar, which is the exact reason for that match to take place. Since Dean and Seth have their feud, you can have those two fight over the #1 contender's spot, even though it isn't needed nor does it make sense, since Seth is already mr. MITB. The obvious solution is a Cena vs Orton vs maybe Kane, and hell, you can even add Dean and Seth in the mix to stall their feud for TLC.
The WWEWHC missing from a PPV is a rare occasion, but it happened back in 2012 with Cm Punk, and the PPV wasn't so bad (we got that 6 man tornado tag and that Ziggler vs Cena ladder match). I suppose that having a decent #1 conteder's match and Dean vs Seth in the cell should sell the show. Of course, if Brock works HIAC, as stated above, it is either Brock vs Cena or you can add Orton to the mix. Orton (and Kane) is showing his displeasure towards Rollins lately, and also had a fight with HHH recently which means he might get away from the Authority, thus chaning the dynamic of the main event scene.
It's not rocket science, creative... Heyman could have come out and say that "someone needs to prove they are good enough, they have what it takes to face Brock and may be able to come out on top." This way, he doesn't specify if the challenger will face Brock at HIAC or in a later PPV, or when that challenger will be revealed, but it definitely buys the WWE some time and gives the fans some explanation / update to what is gonna happen. Not having Paul come out at all just because they don't know how to go on is completely stupid to me, but them not knowing what to do is even more stupid... No wonder why their ratings plummeted this week.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire